A brilliant student, a disturbing experiment, and a determined FBI pursuit set the stage for a psychological thriller where every perspective matters. Take this personality quiz inspired by Unabomber and find out which character you most resemble, from the figures connected to Ted Kaczynski’s Harvard years to those who helped bring the investigation closer to home.
About Unabomber
The 2026 crime drama Unabomber follows Ted Kaczynski from his time as a young Harvard student in psychological experiments to the isolation and anti-technology beliefs behind his attacks. Decades later, FBI agent Joanne Miller studies the bomber’s writing as investigators pursue a case involving deadly mail bombs. As Ted’s estranged family recognizes his words in the manifesto, the past and the investigation converge in a tense historical crime drama spanning two timelines.
Unabomber Character Profiles
Henry Murray
Henry Murray is a Harvard psychology professor who leads a series of confrontational experiments involving young students, including Ted Kaczynski. Dominant and academically driven, he treats the pursuit of psychological insight as more important than the comfort of his subjects. His forceful methods and confidence in his own judgments put him at odds with Christiana Morgan, whose empathy makes her more alert to the toll the sessions take. Murray’s authority shapes the experiments and their unsettling atmosphere.
Joanne Miller
Joanne Miller is an FBI agent on the UNABOM task force, where she argues that the bomber’s language and beliefs offer a path toward identifying him. Obsessive in her attention to detail and unconventional in her approach, she studies the manifesto despite skepticism from colleagues who favor more immediate investigative tactics. Her methodical persistence sets her apart within a rigid bureaucracy, and her close reading of the text becomes central to the investigation’s efforts to find the perpetrator.
Ted Kaczynski
Ted Kaczynski arrives at Harvard as a sixteen-year-old mathematics prodigy, gifted but isolated among older students. He takes part in high-stress psychological experiments led by Henry Murray and Christiana Morgan, experiences that deepen his distrust of authority. As his isolation grows, so does his opposition to industrialization and technological society. The film follows the path from an intellectually intense, vulnerable young man toward a deeply resentful figure whose convictions become increasingly radical.
Christiana Morgan
Christiana Morgan works with Henry Murray at Harvard’s Psychological Clinic, where she helps conduct confrontational experiments with students. Observant and empathetic, she pays close attention to Ted Kaczynski’s deteriorating psychological state and becomes increasingly uneasy about the methods being used. As a professional and personal partner to Murray within a male-dominated institution, Morgan operates inside the same system she has reason to question. Her concern offers a human counterpoint to Murray’s clinical detachment, though her role remains entangled with the experiments.
Leo Driver
Leo Driver is an FBI teammate on the UNABOM task force and a proponent of a more traditional, field-oriented style of investigation. Hotheaded and reactive, he favors aggressive action over the patient analysis of the bomber’s writing that Joanne Miller advocates. Their contrasting methods create friction as the team searches for a suspect. Driver’s impatience reflects the pressure to make progress on a difficult case, as well as his belief that direct investigative work is the surest route to results.
Dean Kaplan
Dean Kaplan is the Special Agent in Charge of the UNABOM task force, responsible for guiding an investigation under intense public pressure. Bureaucratic and focused on immediate, concrete results, he is skeptical of Joanne Miller’s text-heavy approach to identifying the bomber. Kaplan’s rigid expectations make him an obstacle to her unconventional line of inquiry, even as he tries to respond to demands for progress. His character embodies the tension between institutional urgency and the slower work of interpreting evidence.
